Skip to content

When executives speak candidly to regulators

What one OSHA document revealed

Why you can trust Investigate Midwest
Investigate Midwest’s kind of in-depth reporting takes time and resources — and your support makes it possible. Here’s some i
Investigate Midwest’s kind of in-depth reporting takes time and resources — and your support makes it possible. Here’s some insight into what that looks like from our senior reporter Sky Chadde.
Published:

Dec. 30, 2025

I’d been curious about Archer Daniels Midland’s approach to employee safety since 2023, when its flagship facility experienced two explosions months apart. The idea kept percolating until late 2024, when I decided to pursue the story. Putting it all together took about half a year.

A mammoth corporation like ADM interacts with all levels of government, from the feds to the small towns where its plants are located. That means a long paper trail and maneuvering through varying degrees of bureaucracy — so I created a plan to gather as many records as possible.

I built a list of explosions at ADM facilities across the country in recent years. Then, for each incident, I requested safety inspections performed by state or federal officials, police or fire department reports and worker compensation records.

But the most revealing evidence was in an OSHA document. A fire had started at a Nebraska plant, and, when an inspector visited days later, the manager expressed concern about the maintenance performed to prevent explosions. That in itself was interesting, but the OSHA inspector went further. He asked a corporate safety executive about the maintenance issue.

“I’m going to say something that our attorney isn’t going to like,” the executive replied. The manager “has been trying to get rid of the maintenance company for quite some time.”

Here was an executive admitting to slow-rolling needed changes (ADM did not comment). A former OSHA employee later told me such comments by executives rarely make it into government reports. Typically, company representatives are much more tight-lipped.

Without donors and sustainers, I would not have found this document, and it’s likely what the executive said would not have come to light. Finding all the records and analyzing them took six months — a major time investment for any newsroom.

Whether you start a monthly donation or make a one-time gift, your generosity allows us to deliver even more reporting that keeps you informed about the power and influence that shapes U.S. agriculture and affects every layer of our food system.

Your investment in us helps make this possible.

We’ve hit our initial goal but we’re giving ourselves one more challenge: To hit our stretch goal of $30,000 by midnight Dec. 31. What do you say?

With gratitude,

Sky Chadde

Senior Investigative Reporter

P.S. There’s still time! Please help us spread the word by forwarding this email to friends and colleagues who you think would be interested in supporting our work.


More from Investigate Midwest staff

See all

THANK YOU TO OUR FUNDERS

Reva & David Logan Foundation, Inasmuch Foundation, Lumpkin Family Foundation, Builders Vision Philanthropy, Gary Marx Journalism Fund, Kirkpatrick Foundation, Chicago Region Food System Fund, Illinois Food Movement Fund, GRACE Communications, Good Chaos, Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute, Fund for Investigative Journalism, Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting, Rural News Network, Google News Initiative, Data-Driven Reporting Project, Arnold Ventures.

We are proud to hold the Candid Seal of Transparency, demonstrating our commitment to openness and accountability in all that we do.

MEMBER OF